Should I make this a news article????
--------------------------------------------------
Due to recent (and less recent) events, I felt the need to make this stamp.
A lot of people are still 'robbed' from their art. Most of the time without even knowing. So this stamp is to make people aware of the problem and not only report art theft of your own but also other artists.
Here's my advice:
What can you do to protect your art?
1.
Put a watermark on the image. On DA this is very easy, the website can automatically add a watermark to the fullview images. You can select this option when you upload your image.
Pro: It will be protected
Con: The watermark is huge and disturbs the image
2.
Add a watermark yourself. You can add a smaller watermark yourself, for example your name and/or your website at the edge of a picture.
Pro: This will not disturb the image, and if people post is somewhere your name will be visible
Con: People can easily cut away the edge with your name on it.
Someone put my artwork online, what should I do?
First of all you'll need to find out what sort of website they put it on, and what the purpose is.
It the image is just there to share, and your name is mentioned as the original owner, there's no further action you should take, except maybe thank the person for sharing your art with other people.
If the image is put online to share, but your name isn't mentioned, you can kindly ask them to put your name and/or website with the image. In my experience these people will be happy to do so. If not, you should try to contact the site's admins, and they should be able to handle the problem.
If the image is put online and the person that did so claims to be the original artist, stay calm and friendly, and ask him/her to get it offline. If he/she doens't respond to that (within a resonable amount of time), you can contact the site's admins, and they should take care of it.
If the images is put online here at DA (which is to share YOUR art only, with exception of clubs), you can contact the person responsible about this and kindly ask them to remove the image. If they don't respond to that (within a resonable amount of time) you can click the link 'Report Policy Violation' under the technical details of the artwork. Fill in all the required details and DA should take care of it.
I've seen an art rip from another artist, should I do anything?
Yes!
If you see an art rip, you should always take action. You'd be happy if someone informed you about someone stealing your art, so you should do the same.
This doesn't mean that you should spend hours to search the internet for possible rips, but if you would come across one, don't ignore it!
You should contact the original artist, and give him the information.
Wether you contact the thief or website staff is up to you, usually metioning it to the original artist is enough, and he or she will take care of it herself.
---------------------------------
I hope this is enough information about this subject.
You can add the stamp to your journal to make more people aware of this.
I don't like the words "stealing", "thiefs", etc in this text, they should be "copyright breach", "copyright breacher" etc.
Virtual things can't be "owned", cause the concept of ownership only has use when applied to scarse objects. A digital image isn't scarse, since the copying of it doesn't make someone else lose their copy. Something that can't be owned can't be stolen as well, since no-one loses their copy.
More appropriate verbing when someone claims a picture to be theirs is not theft, but fraud. Since in essence it is someone pretending to be someone he isn't (viz. the author of a certain work). In this way what people call "identity theft" is a rubbish concept as well, since it is nothing but fraud, a word that has long been established to denote exactly these kinds of actions (forging a signature is fraud, not "signature theft" for example).
Apart from that, this is a nice text though.
--
Electro signals shooting through braincells - signifying the battle inside.
Actually, virtual things can be owned; ever heard of domain names? People buy those, you know. But beyond that, if you take an image from someone's page and put it on your own, you are stealing it; note the key word "take." So yes, it's theft. The concept of ownership does not only apply to scarce (I'm guessing that's the word you were trying to spell) objects (whatever a scarce object is even supposed to be), but to any object a person owns. We own our work; we created it. If someone takes it without permission and uses it for their own purposes, regardless of the way they use it, it's theft. Just because the image is digital doesn't mean we no longer own it.
--
Agatha Harkness [link] One of the Witte Wieven [link] Captain Cori the Green [link]
orphan works bill? I never heard of it (or vaguely maybe ), and I have had a copyright course. What is it? (maybe it doesn't exist in belgium, but I'm going to look it up, it sound so wrong... :s)
Hmm, that sounds really unrealistic. As you automatically have the copyright on the work you've made, you don't have to demand some kind of status over your work, you don't need to fill in paperwork. You don't even need to place a copyrightmark with your work to protect it...
New deals posted everyday, starting Black Friday and running through the holiday season! No hassles, no lines - just awesome savings on art, deviantWEAR, Premium Memberships and more!
Discussing page views, activity and popularity, ~ChaoticSkye explores the inner workings of the community on deviantART from her point of view.
Although this does not apply to everyone, we hope the article is a worthwhile read and that the majority perceive things from a different point of view from reading this.
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it. Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article.
In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it.
Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article. In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
Project Comment is a project that features the generally obscured and underappreciated artists and their art in regular news articles. Our objective is to recognise deviants who deserve more recognition and to feature deviations with less than 10 original comments.
The 0-5 Comments Issues feature a deviant as well as 3 deviations with less than 5 original comments from a wide selection of art. Please give your time to this article and to write constructive comments so that you make a true difference to the artists featured here.
The Deviousness Award is an accolade which is traditionally handed out on the 1st of every month to one trully outstanding deviant. `Cyantre is one of the most helpful deviants within our community. With a positive attitude and a resourceful mind, you can always find him providing support and encouragement to those in need. Always looking for ways in which he can get more involved in our community, John's positive presence is to be aspired to. A well respected poet, John is a must-have on your deviantWATCH to make sure that you don't miss out on your dose of community inspiration. It's with great pleasure that the Deviousness Award for November 2009 goes to... Read More
Comments
--
Many of my friends became my enemies, many enemies became friends - only those who never cared either way remained constant.
(S.J.Lec.)
--
www.katrijnmichiels.be
Virtual things can't be "owned", cause the concept of ownership only has use when applied to scarse objects. A digital image isn't scarse, since the copying of it doesn't make someone else lose their copy. Something that can't be owned can't be stolen as well, since no-one loses their copy.
More appropriate verbing when someone claims a picture to be theirs is not theft, but fraud. Since in essence it is someone pretending to be someone he isn't (viz. the author of a certain work). In this way what people call "identity theft" is a rubbish concept as well, since it is nothing but fraud, a word that has long been established to denote exactly these kinds of actions (forging a signature is fraud, not "signature theft" for example).
Apart from that, this is a nice text though.
--
Electro signals shooting through braincells - signifying the battle inside.
The club
--
Real Sister: =Fairy-red-hime
Avatar made by ~CookieLin
--
Agatha Harkness [link] One of the Witte Wieven [link] Captain Cori the Green [link]
but thanks to stuff like the orphan works bill
people can steal art then © it and you cant do CRAP about it!
--
I am a practicing christan ^^
-I am Zero! the shomrey of light!
-------------
zer0's words of wisdom
1- stop,drop,n roll doesnt work in hell....
I never heard of it (or vaguely maybe
--
www.katrijnmichiels.be
it says pretty much that anyone can © your work if you didnt already
--
I am a practicing christan ^^
-I am Zero! the shomrey of light!
-------------
zer0's words of wisdom
1- stop,drop,n roll doesnt work in hell....
As you automatically have the copyright on the work you've made, you don't have to demand some kind of status over your work, you don't need to fill in paperwork. You don't even need to place a copyrightmark with your work to protect it...
--
www.katrijnmichiels.be
Previous Page12Next Page